Waldorf Pulse 2 panel released

[msepsis]

Finally released my next editor, this one is for the Waldorf Pulse 2. Since most of the paramters on the Pulse 2 are identical to the original Pulse this editor is also mostly compatible with the original Pulse. Further work will be done to enhance the compatibility with the older model eventually.

• This topic was modified 9 years, 11 months ago by msepsis.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

Monstrum Media | Music, Sound & Software Design, Chicago / San Francisco listen

[opuswerk]

Don’t have a pulse, but your panel looks tasty 🙂

I wish I could make the UI of mine look the same. Great job!

http://opuswerk.tumblr.com
www.soundcloud.com/opuswerk
www.facebook.com/opuswerk

[zeoka]

I plan to get one i’ll buy the panel too !
great work

[jasefos]

Very, very tidy looking GUI! Nice work.
I hope to have a Pulse 2 at some stage.

--> Music: www.soundcloud.com/jasefos
--> DAW: OSX10.10.5 with Live 9.6 x64, UA Apollo Quad
--> Controllers: Push 2, KeyLab61, Maschine mk2, MCU Pro, 2xMCU-Ext
--> Synths: Cyclone Bass Bot TT303, ESQ1, MKS80/MPG80, Matrix 6R, Matrix1000, Mopho, 05RW, DW8000, Virus TI Polar, Voyager Electric Blue, MiniBrute, AN1X, K5000s, FIZMO, ASR10 rack, Kenton ProSolo (controls Sequential Pro-One, Yamaha CS15), Prophecy, EMX1, MonoTribe, SP1200, DX100, KARP Odyssey

[overand]

As a new user here, I find myself a bit confused as to why MSepsis is posting these here – given CTRLR is a free/open source project, and it appears the MSepsis panels are commercian & not open source.

Do they make use of the CTRLR engine? Or, is msepsis just advertising here?

[msepsis]

overand wrote:

Do they make use of the CTRLR engine?

Yes of course.

And with regard to your other question I requested atom’s OK before ever selling any of my editors because of the same concern. He fully approves.

Monstrum Media | Music, Sound & Software Design, Chicago / San Francisco listen

[Author]

Posts